ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: Cops have better things to do than enforce the inane strictures of the smoking Stasi

What, exactly, are we accomplishing by prohibiting smoking and vaping in establishments that cater, exclusively, to a clientele who smoke and vape? Next to nothing, as a practical matter, yet publicly-funded researchers are "studying" it anyway.

vaping tools.jpg
Various vaping tools and small containers with flavored chemicals. John M. Steiner / The Sun
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — Brace yourselves, dear readers, for a stunning revelation comes our way.

"Only two of 35 vape shops in North Dakota fully complied with the state's smoke-free law, according to the findings of a study recently published by North Dakota State University," Michelle Griffith reports .

I'm shocked that people who operate vape shops aren't martinets about North Dakota's inane smoking policies.

The vapers haven't properly posted their no-smoking signs? Be still my heart.

People are smoking less than 20 feet from an establishment? Call out the National Guard.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Local law enforcement and state officials could also up their efforts to enforce the smoke-free law," Griffith reports, citing the study, but on the list of priorities for our very busy friends in law enforcement, hassling vape shops about signage should be at the bottom.
When was the last time you saw a cop busting someone for smoking too close to a bar entrance? Probably never, because the cops have better things to do.

That this "study" is a rank bit of activism masquerading as academic inquiry is clear. "The researchers said the study shows North Dakota lawmakers could enact further policy changes to get more shops to comply with the smoke-free law, like expanding the state's existing tobacco-control laws to include vaping and e-cigarettes," Griffith reports. "This would require all vape shops to be licensed by the state, like the places that sell tobacco."

It's long been a goal of the smoking Stasi to treat vaping as though it were exactly like traditional tobacco use, and this "study" is part of the propaganda effort behind that push.

The "study" only looked at the state's vape shops. Not included in the "research" were grocery stores or gas stations, bars or wholesale tobacco stores, which are all places that sell vaping or tobacco products, or both, and where people across the state can routinely be seen smoking less than 20 feet from entrances.

The activists behind the "study" targeted the vapers because they want vaping lumped in with smoking under the state's tobacco regulations even though the two habits are far from equivalent in many ways, including public health impact.

This is obnoxious, and detrimental to our larger goal of public health.

ADVERTISEMENT

Can we please stop politicizing public health? The COVID-19 pandemic has given us all an object lesson in how unhelpful it is for public health officials to become de facto politicians. The public can sense when a public health initiative has a political agenda, and it makes them respect public health officials less.

And can we also stop wasting public health dollars on pursuing this very stupid tobacco temperance movement?

What, exactly, are we accomplishing by prohibiting smoking and vaping in establishments that cater, exclusively, to a clientele who smoke and vape? Next to nothing, as a practical matter, yet publicly-funded researchers are "studying" it anyway.

To comment on this article, visit www.sayanythingblog.com

Rob Port, founder of SayAnythingBlog.com, is a Forum Communications commentator. Reach him on Twitter at @robport or via email at rport@forumcomm.com .

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next