Port: North Dakota's two largest farm groups set aside differences to oppose term limits

“We felt it important to voice together our concerns about this measure,” said North Dakota Farmers Union President Mark Watne in a statement his group released jointly with the NDFB. “At Farmers

North Dakota Farmers Union President Mark Watne.
North Dakota Farmers Union President Mark Watne.
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — The North Dakota Farm Bureau and the North Dakota Farmer's Union are like the Republican and Democratic parties of agriculture. They often share many of the same goals, but as often they differ sharply on how to get there.

But the two groups are in agreement on one thing this election cycle: North Dakota doesn't need term limits.

“We felt it important to voice together our concerns about this measure,” said North Dakota Farmers Union President Mark Watne in a statement his group released jointly with the NDFB. “At Farmers Union, we have longstanding policy that opposes term limits because they are a limitation on the rights of citizens to choose and elect their public officials. Term limits also put more power into the hands of professional lobbyists and career bureaucrats.”

“Limiting state legislative terms would result in terrible consequences for the rural citizens and communities of North Dakota,” Daryl Lies, NDFB president, said in the same release. “Why should we be forced to get rid of the very people who are good for North Dakota? As voters, we should have the right to vote for leaders of our choice.”

This development is as surprising as it is spot-on accurate.


At the heart of every term limits proposal is this odious notion that voters are too stupid to decide for themselves when enough is enough for a particular elected leader, and so must be denied certain choices.

I'm certain we could all name a few people who have held elected office far past the point at which they stopped serving the public well, but if that official's constituents want to keep voting for him, or her, who are we to tell them they can't?

When we talk about North Dakota's general fund spending, we talk about less than half of the dollars state lawmakers appropriated. We need a better way to measure state spending.
North Dakota judges are already required to report deviations to minimum sentencing guidelines, and there have been just two since 2016.
If there's some red line that Trump could cross, some depth he could stoop to in words or action, that would cost him the support of North Dakota's delegation, he doesn't seem to have crossed it
"Do we want conservatism to be seen as a pragmatic set of principles for balancing our collective need for a government with the rights of individuals? Or the gospel of some fire-and-brimstone
Somehow, Trump-aligned "conservatives" went full circle, from prudent skeptics of authoritarianism to its footsoldiers, Rob Port writes.

The very real side effect of term limits will be weakened elected officials, particularly in the Legislature, who will never get the opportunity to gain the sort of experience and knowledge that would allow them to serve as an effective check on executive branch and bureaucratic power.

A vote for term limits is a vote to give more power to people who spend their careers in government without ever having to appear on the ballot.

But what's surprising about these groups coming together to spread that message is that most people in state politics view term limits as a fait accompli. The term limits campaign has released polling they commissioned showing that over 80% of North Dakotans support term limits. I've seen other polls, not released to the public, with similar results.

There are many prominent people and groups in North Dakota politics who very much oppose term limits, but few of them seem willing to attempt the daunting task of persuading a seemingly convinced electorate that this is a bad idea.

Kudos to the Farmer's Union, and the Farm Bureau, for speaking up. They're making the right argument, even if our state's political winds are blowing in their faces.

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
"You love who you love."
The season is here. There is that moment of opening the card and sharing joy of the season. The words. The pictures.
Trump has been an aberration. He stormed onto the political scene and rallied a following before most people knew who or what he was. Because he won in the primaries, the rational Republicans had
Columnist Roxane B. Salonen writes, "Only time can heal the great loss we feel when our loved ones die—and even that, imperfectly. But there is something deeper, and truer, than what we can hold in