ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Port: North Dakota Democrats vote to continue supporting pro-life U.S. House candidate

A resolution introduced by one of the party's Bismarck-area district chairs would have asked the party to withhold support from Mark Haugen, the Democratic-NPL nominated candidate for U.S. House who

4G1A1065.jpg
Mark Haugen, a student advisor at the University of Mary in Bismarck, announces his candidacy for U.S. House of Representatives at the North Dakota Democratic-NPL Party's state convention in Minot on Saturday, March 26, 2022.
Kyle Martin / The Forum
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — A pro-life Democrat running for North Dakota's at-large U.S. House seat will still enjoy the support of his party despite push back from some activists.

Yesterday I reported that a district chairman for the North Dakota Democratic-NPL would be introducing a resolution calling on the party to pull support from U.S. House candidate Mark Haugen .

I can report that last night the resolution failed after an angry, and at times profane, speech from the party's District 7 chairman Patrick Englehart.

I had attempted to speak to Englehart about his resolution yesterday, but he told me he won't speak to me because he's "not a big fan" of my work.

According to my sources who attended the meeting, which was held virtually, Englehart addressed the party's policy committee for approximately 10 to 15 minutes, accusing conservatives of treating women like "brood mares" and "chattel," and accusing the Democratic-NPL of doing too much to compromise with conservatives.

ADVERTISEMENT

He also argued that, whether the party continues supporting him or not, Haugen is going to lose.

He told committee members that he should probably not speak up on this issue, to avoid more "Rob Port columns" about disunity in the party, but that he felt he had to. He also clashed with party chairman Patrick Hart and committee parliamentarian Chris McEwen, accusing them of trying to limit the amount of time he could speak.

MORE FROM ROB PORT
When we talk about North Dakota's general fund spending, we talk about less than half of the dollars state lawmakers appropriated. We need a better way to measure state spending.
North Dakota judges are already required to report deviations to minimum sentencing guidelines, and there have been just two since 2016.
If there's some red line that Trump could cross, some depth he could stoop to in words or action, that would cost him the support of North Dakota's delegation, he doesn't seem to have crossed it

He said, repeatedly, that the message from "conservative Christians" to women was "f--- you," a remark that earned him a rebuke from Hart and one other committee attendee who objected because his child was listening.

At the end of his speech, Englehart asked for a roll call vote, asking committee members to put their names beside their vote.

Other committee members spoke, some in favor of abortion, and others in favor of Haugen, after which the voice vote was called and the resolution failed.

The committee ultimately rejected holding a roll call vote, but observers said it was clear that the resolution received only two voice votes, one from Englehart himself.

There were approximately 55 committee members present.

After the vote, Haugen stood and thanked the committee for their support in what was described to me as an emotional speech.

ADVERTISEMENT

He promised to represent all members of the party regardless of their beliefs.

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at rport@forumcomm.com. Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
"You love who you love."
The season is here. There is that moment of opening the card and sharing joy of the season. The words. The pictures.
"Do we want conservatism to be seen as a pragmatic set of principles for balancing our collective need for a government with the rights of individuals? Or the gospel of some fire-and-brimstone
Trump has been an aberration. He stormed onto the political scene and rallied a following before most people knew who or what he was. Because he won in the primaries, the rational Republicans had