Plain Talk: North Dakota's Sierra Club doesn't oppose carbon capture pipeline

"We're a pretty practical bunch of people," Dr. Dexter Perkins, a geologist at the University of North Dakota, said of his Sierra Club chapter.

Wade Boeshans.jpeg
Wade Boeshans, executive vice president at Summit Carbon Solutions, who grew up in the Beulah, North Dakota, area, speaks to local farmers and ranchers at a project demonstration in Mercer County on Nov. 18, 2021.
Craig Bihrle / The Forum
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINOT, N.D. — The Sierra Club in other states, such as Iowa, is opposed to the Carbon Express pipeline, but not in North Dakota.

They're not against it.

They're also not for it.

"If we voted, we would probably vote to oppose it," Dr. Dexter Perkins, a member of the North Dakota chapter of the high-profile environmental activist group, told me on this Plain Talk.

When I wrote in a recent column that the Sierra Club opposes the pipeline, Perkins actually emailed me to protest my characterization.


His group, at least, is not opposed.

Perkins, who is also a geologist at the University of North Dakota, says he's skeptical that the pipeline will work, but he and his group are hoping it does.

"We're hoping we're wrong," he said, noting that the club's refusal to condemn the project "puts us in the minority among environmental groups."

That's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the pipeline, which would bring carbon emissions from ethanol plants across the Upper Midwest to North Dakota where they would be pumped underground, but given the intensity of environmental politics, but given the polarizing nature of environmental politics in America, the reticence to be opposed seems like a breakthrough for pragmatism.

Perkins agrees. "We're a pretty practical bunch of people," he said of his Sierra Club chapter.

Click here to subscribe to the Plain Talk Podcast!
I'm just not seeing a constituency of North Dakota voters that Mund could appeal to that's large enough to lead her to victory. But, again, that's assuming that she's running to win, and not as a way to keep her celebrity alive post-Miss America.

Opinion by Rob Port
Rob Port is a news reporter, columnist, and podcast host for the Forum News Service. He has an extensive background in investigations and public records. He has covered political events in North Dakota and the upper Midwest for two decades. Reach him at Click here to subscribe to his Plain Talk podcast.
What to read next
A summer trip offered a much greater appreciation of the vastness of God’s creation on earth, while also putting things into perspective.
This is an extraordinary situation that requires extraordinary measures. The FBI search is now a very public fact, and its significance is not lost on anyone.
Something somewhat similar happened in North Dakota in 2014.
"A Texas jury ordered Alex Jones to pay $49.3 million for pain, suffering, and punitive damages for relentlessly smearing grieving Sandy Hook families as hoaxers. ... What kind of soulless cretin instigates that kind of trauma on already traumatized people?"