EAST GRAND FORKS -- Although new rules regarding a presidential debate format allowing "improvisation, intellectual engagement and truth-telling" would be a true leap forward, I disagree with the Herald editorial's conclusion that "Judging by this year's debates, the candidates have that studied, inoffensive blandness down pat" ("Presidential debates need new rules," Page D1, Oct. 12).
There has been nothing "bland" about either candidate.
Sen. Barack Obama's steady head and remaining on point is not bland ("dull, insipid, tasteless," according to my dictionary), and there has been nothing "bland" about Sen. John McCain's refusal to face Obama during the first debate, appearing to stifle his anger with forced grimaces.
Nor was McCain's reference to Obama as "That one" during the town hall meeting debate bland. McCain has been downright hostile, full of personal attacks against Obama, yet he concluded at the second debate we need a leader with a "steady hand at the tiller."
Obama has been the "steady hand" whom I believe won the debates with his intellect and integrity. I find that comforting during these difficult times.
ADVERTISEMENT
Let the improvisation and engagement come, but give us the steady, calm leader -- not a hot-head -- even if you think he's "bland."
Therese Jacobson
