ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Grand Forks City Council holds off on voting site discussion

Grand Forks city leaders will wait another two weeks to decide where voters hit the polls next year, voting 4-0 to table a selection process for the 2018 primary and general elections' voting locations.

We are part of The Trust Project.

Grand Forks city leaders will wait another two weeks to decide where voters hit the polls next year, voting 4-0 to table a selection process for the 2018 primary and general elections' voting locations.

The move will allow more city leaders to vote on the process. City Council members Dana Sande, Bret Weber and Danny Weigel were all absent from Tuesday evening's meeting, Weber has been described as especially interested in voting on the matter.

The delay also gives city leaders and the public more time to consider locations for 2018 voting, which has at times been a contentious issue in the past year. The 2018 plan city leaders are expected to pass has seven voting locations throughout the city, with one in wards 1 through 4, two for Ward 5 and one for Wards 6 and 7. It was approved in a 5-2 vote in committee last week.

That plan contrasts with some of the city's other options. Sande has advocated for one Alerus Center polling location for all of Grand Forks, which he said would provide simplicity. But that system came under fire when it was used in this year's special elections on Arbor Park and the city's sales tax, raising concerns that fewer election sites could reduce voter access.

State Rep. Corey Mock, D-Grand Forks and the husband of City Council member Jeannie Mock, said he sent an email to City Council members suggesting several voting sites that all voters could use. But as City Clerk Sherie Lundmark pointed out at the meeting, current technology can't keep the pace with such a plan. As voters cast a ballot at one location, it's not detectable for other polling stations until votes are tallied at the end of the day, leading to problems sorting out potential voter fraud.

ADVERTISEMENT

"I'm glad Corey brought it up, because I think it makes a lot of sense," City Council member Crystal Schneider said, though she agreed that it might not be possible to implement it yet. "It makes it far more convenient for people and far less confusing-(though) maybe not for the poll workers."

Schneider added that she's in favor of holding "as many polling locations as possible." Asked how she would reconcile that stance with the city's use of one polling site for two special elections earlier this year-on Arbor Park and the city's sales tax-Schneider said those elections didn't require ward-by-ward decisions.

The discussion comes as C.T. Marhula continues a lawsuit against the city that alleges leaders exceeded their authority when they held all voting on the Arbor Park matter at the Alerus Center. That suit is pending before the North Dakota Supreme Court.

The voting locations are expected to be next addressed by the council Dec. 18.

Other business

• City leaders also voted 3-1 to offer approval to a yearlong extension of a special city housing incentive that offers a delay on special assessment payments. Now new developments have until November 2019 to qualify for the deferral, a move that benefits a development by Crary Real Estate in the south end with more than 100 units that would have otherwise missed the deadline. City Council member Jeannie Mock dissented.

• The City Council voted 4-0 on its consent agenda to award a $4.6 million contract to Reede Construction Inc., for part of a $6.4 million reconstruction project along North 42nd Street between University Avenue and Gateway Drive next year. The city's cost share on the project is expected to come to $1.8 million.

• City leaders also gave a 4-0 preliminary vote to update local code on the body art industry, creating licensing provisions for "temporary or mobile" facilities and tightening safety regulations elsewhere. The move further regulates many tattoo and piercing businesses.

Related Topics: GRAND FORKS CITY COUNCIL
What to read next
Experts warn that simply claiming the benefits may create paper trails for law enforcement officials in states criminalizing abortion. That will complicate life for the dozens of corporations promising to protect, or even expand, the abortion benefits for employees and their dependents.
In Minnesota, abortion is protected by the state’s constitution and is legal up to the point of viability, which is generally thought to begin at about 24 weeks, when the fetus can survive outside the womb. Those who work with Minnesotans who seek abortions say barriers, both legal and practical, forced some to travel to Colorado, Nebraska, New Mexico, Washington, D.C., and Wisconsin even prior to the Supreme Court’s decision.
"Minding Our Elders" columnist says it's important to remember that we can't "fix" aging for our parents, but we can listen with empathy and validate their feelings.
“It’s clear that monkeypox has come to Minnesota,” said state Epidemiologist Dr. Ruth Lynfield. “While our current cases are associated with travel outside Minnesota, we expect we will soon see cases among people who have no travel history or contact with someone who did, indicating that spread within social networks in Minnesota is occurring.”