Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.



GOP feels heat over resolution

WASHINGTON Today's milestone vote in the House of Representatives opposing President Bush's troop increase in Iraq will be no cliff-hanger it's certain to pass but its potential political consequences have lawmakers grinding their teeth.

WASHINGTON Today's milestone vote in the House of Representatives opposing President Bush's troop increase in Iraq will be no cliff-hanger it's certain to pass but its potential political consequences have lawmakers grinding their teeth.

The nonbinding resolution could influence lawmakers' re-election prospects, their willingness to back stronger antiwar policies later and how other nations view the United States.

No one feels more pressure over the vote than the lawmakers mostly Republicans who won election last November by narrow margins.

Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla., whose 369-vote margin still is being contested, said he had struggled over this vote for weeks as he met with intelligence experts, ambassadors and war veterans. He said he would announce his decision in a speech on the House floor. Whatever he does, he said: "A lot of people want to make this about politics. This shouldn't be about politics."

Republicans in swing districts who don't back the resolution can expect to be attacked in next year's elections. They include Reps. Deborah Pryce of Ohio, Dave Reichert of Washington state, Thelma Drake of Virginia and Robin Hayes of North Carolina. Each barely won re-election last November. This vote could end their careers.


"There are a lot of seats in play," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. "I think this is going to be a big issue for voters in 2008."

Dozens of Republicans are expected to vote for the Democrats' resolution opposing the 21,500-troop increase. Some of them hail from conservative districts and won re-election last year by wide margins. Others won with 55 percent of the vote or less, including Reps. Ric Keller of Florida, Phil English of Pennsylvania and Tom Davis of Virginia. By crossing party lines, they could build support from independents and Democrats, but they also could court primary challenges.

A few Democrats from conservative districts are similarly torn.

Bush says the resolution won't change his plans no matter how many Republicans support it.

Once the vote clears, House Democrats intend to shift to binding legislation to limit troop deployments and funding.

Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., the chief House defense appropriator, detailed a plan Thursday that he hopes the full House can vote on by mid-March.

It would prohibit troop deployments in Iraq from being extended beyond a year, require troops to get at least one year home between deployments and require them to be certified as fully trained and equipped before being sent into combat. It also would end the "stop-loss" program that forced some service members to remain on active duty beyond their enlistment periods.

"That stops the surge for all intents and purposes," because the Pentagon would be short of troops if it followed the requirements, Murtha said.


House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio said Murtha's proposal would hurt troops already there. He called it "unthinkable."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., is trying to pressure Republicans to let the Senate vote on the House's nonbinding resolution, and he scheduled a test vote for Saturday. Beyond that, Reid said, he isn't sure what binding legislation the Senate will pursue or whether any can pass.

"The president has the veto pen," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., the chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. "No one thinks we have 67 votes" to override a veto.

"It's a process. We are going to keep ratcheting up the pressure so that public opinion and congressional opinion is so strong that the president will have no choice but to change strategy."

Americans' dismay over Iraq continues to grow. A Pew Research Center poll released Thursday found that 63 percent oppose Bush's buildup.

What To Read Next
Nonprofit hospitals are required to provide free or discounted care, also known as charity care; yet eligibility and application requirements vary across hospitals. Could you qualify? We found out.
Crisis pregnancy centers received almost $3 million in taxpayer funds in 2022. Soon, sharing only medically accurate information could be a prerequisite for funding.
The Grand Forks Blue Zones Project, which hopes to make Grand Forks not just a healthier city but a closer community, is hosting an event on Saturday, Jan. 21, at the Empire Arts Center from 3-5 p.m.
A bill being considered by the North Dakota Legislature would require infertility treatment for public employees — a step that could lead to requiring private insurance for the costly treatments.