Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

COLUMNIST LLOYD OMDAHL -- Immigration reform is a pipe dream

Comprehensive immigration reform is a pipe dream. Even though everyone agrees that illegal immigration is an important issue, the problem is unsolvable, considering the fragmentation of opinion in the public, among policymakers and the immediate ...

Comprehensive immigration reform is a pipe dream. Even though everyone agrees that illegal immigration is an important issue, the problem is unsolvable, considering the fragmentation of opinion in the public, among policymakers and the immediate stakeholders.

First, the mood of the public is not amenable to negotiation on the issue. Recent polls indicate that half of the people favor the law in Arizona that encourages law enforcement personnel to ask about legal status in an arrest when there is reason to believe that the person is in the U.S. illegally.

It is obvious that the public mood is more inclined toward getting tough than getting generous.

Second, the issue is a political standoff between a majority of the Republicans and a majority of the Democrats. The Democrats are soft-pedaling ("stonewalling" would be a better word) the issue because a large majority of the Hispanics voted for Obama in the last election. Noting the mushrooming Hispanic population, Democrats are looking forward to keeping Hispanics in their electoral base.

But Republican strategists also want to get a share of this electoral bonanza, so they won't come right out and define a clear position on illegal immigration. But to stop any liberalization of immigration rules, they use a term that stops negotiations: amnesty.

ADVERTISEMENT

It is an intimidating word because it sounds like a reward for breaking the law when the legitimate immigrants labor through five years before they can be granted citizenship. Republicans will brand any concessions to illegal immigrants as amnesty.

But all is not peace and harmony in Republican circles. A considerable number of businessmen, most of whom are Republicans, need the illegal immigrants to work their fields, clean their hotels and perform scores of other jobs that locals refuse to consider at the going wage. These Republicans would favor a more lenient process to get the workers they need.

Then there is the underground railroad, consisting of Mexican-American citizens who are co-conspirators in the evasion of immigration laws. The members of this network protect and hide their Mexican friends and relatives from the law. They also are among those leading marches in the streets, lobbying for liberalization of immigration laws and protesting any government action to curb immigration. They are fighting for a cheap pass into the country.

The Catholic hierarchy is somewhere in this mix because the vast majority of illegal immigrants are Catholic. The hierarchy is not in the front line of the debate, but it usually is ready with an influential word when one is appropriate.

Here again, there is division: Many of the rank-and-file Catholics are not in agreement with the leadership on this issue. Their grandparents were required to go through the legal process, and they feel that the integrity of the system ought to be preserved, regardless of who is involved.

Finally, we come to the 11 million illegal immigrants already in the country. Any reform legislation certainly would require all 11 million to identify themselves; but if they wouldn't come out for a harmless U.S. Census headcount, neither will they risk deportation by showing their faces under new legislation.

Only blanket citizenship for everyone would allay their fears. That would be amnesty, pure and simple.

Under our system of government, nothing can be done until massive consensus exists. Right now, there isn't any. It is obvious that the opinions of the public, the policymakers and the stakeholders are too divergent for reform to happen.

ADVERTISEMENT

The only reform in sight is longer and higher walls on the border, and there isn't even much consensus on that, or it would be happening with more vigor.

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT