ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Supreme Court weighs 'remain in Mexico' immigration dispute

The policy prevented certain non-Mexican migrants, including asylum seekers fearing persecution in their home countries, from being released into the United States to await immigration proceedings, instead returning them to Mexico.

Asylum-seeking migrants cross the Rio Bravo river in El Paso
Asylum-seeking migrants cross the Rio Bravo river to turn themselves in to U.S Border Patrol agents to request asylum in El Paso, Texas, as seen from Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, on April 21, 2022.
JOSE LUIS GONZALEZ/REUTERS
We are part of The Trust Project.

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday is set to consider President Joe Biden's bid to rescind a hardline immigration policy begun under his predecessor Donald Trump that forced tens of thousands of migrants to stay in Mexico to await U.S. hearings on their asylum claims.

The justices are scheduled to hear oral arguments in a Biden administration appeal of a lower court ruling that reinstated Trump's "remain in Mexico" policy after the Republican-led states of Texas and Missouri sued to maintain the program. Biden suspended the policy, which changed longstanding U.S. practice, shortly after taking office last year.

Trump's administration adopted the policy, formally known as the "Migrant Protection Protocols," in response to an increase in migration along the U.S.-Mexican border in 2018. The policy prevented certain non-Mexican migrants, including asylum seekers fearing persecution in their home countries, from being released into the United States to await immigration proceedings, instead returning them to Mexico.

The dispute centers on how much discretion the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, thinks Biden and his administration have to change course on immigration policy.

In its appeal to the justices, Biden's administration said it is being "forced to reinstate and indefinitely continue a controversial policy" that exposes migrants to safety risks, harms relations with Mexico and is not the best tool for deterring illegal immigration.

ADVERTISEMENT

The administration also said that the lower courts are unacceptably interfering with the historically broad authority that U.S. presidents have held over immigration and foreign affairs — a principle that the Supreme Court has long endorsed including in cases when Trump was president.

At issue in the case is the meaning of a provision of a 1996 U.S. immigration law that says U.S. officials "may return" certain immigrants to Mexican territory pending immigration proceedings. Biden's administration said the provision is "unmistakably" discretionary and that the lower court's decision means that every presidential administration "has been in open and systemic violation" of the law since it was created.

Administrations prior to Trump's presidency had used the provision on a limited basis. For migrants who do not pose a security risk, immigration law separately allows their release into the United States pending a hearing, a practice that officials have followed for decades.

Roughly 68,000 people fell under the "remain in Mexico" policy from the time it took effect in 2019 until Biden suspended it in 2021.

Biden's fellow Democrats and immigration advocates criticized the Trump policy, saying migrants stuck in Mexican border cities have faced kidnappings and other dangers.

The number of migrants caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border has reached record highs recently. Republicans have criticized Biden's immigration policies and contend that the "remain in Mexico" policy effectively deterred unlawful migration.

Texas and Missouri challenged the Biden administration's move to scrap the policy, including a memo terminating the program issued last June.

After a federal judge reinstated the program, the Supreme Court last August refused a Biden administration request to block that ruling while the government pursued an appeal.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in December that because the government does not have the capacity to detain all migrants who are not eligible for admission pending a hearing, it must maintain "remain in Mexico."

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; editing by Will Dunham.)

What to read next
The avowed white supremacist pleaded guilty on Monday, Nov. 28, to first-degree murder and other state charges in a mass shooting that killed 10 people and wounded three others in May at a supermarket in a predominantly Black neighborhood of Buffalo, New York. In June, he initially pleaded not guilty after a grand jury returned an indictment.
Bing also wrote in the document titled "death note" that he planned to spare a person, whose name was redacted, because she had a special place in his heart, citing his own mother's death from cancer.
Tuesday's bloodshed was the latest episode of gun violence in the United States which has fueled debate over tighter restrictions on access to guns.
Trump was the first president in four decades not to release his tax returns as he sought to keep secret the details of his wealth and the activities of his real estate company, the Trump Organization.