We see that you have javascript disabled. Please enable javascript and refresh the page to continue reading local news. If you feel you have received this message in error, please contact the customer support team at 1-833-248-7801.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Court upholds Minnesota procedures for checking absentee ballots

Monday's unanimous ruling is the latest dismissal of a push from the Minnesota Voters Alliance to change the makeup and procedures around absentee ballot boards, which must accept or reject absentee ballots. It's part of an effort from conservatives nationally to change the way absentee ballots are handled.

US-NEWS-COURT-UPHOLDS-MINNESOTA-PROCEDURES-FOR-1-MS.jpg
The Minnesota Court of Appeals has upheld state procedures on when election judges must review signatures on absentee ballot envelopes.
Glen Stubbe / Star Tribune / TNS file photo
We are part of The Trust Project.

MINNEAPOLIS -- The Minnesota Court of Appeals has upheld state procedures on when election judges must review signatures on absentee ballot envelopes, knocking back a challenge from a conservative election organization that argued the law requires more scrutiny.

Monday's unanimous ruling is the latest dismissal of a push from the Minnesota Voters Alliance to change the makeup and procedures around absentee ballot boards, which must accept or reject absentee ballots. It's part of an effort from conservatives nationally to change the way absentee ballots are handled.

"With more Minnesotans making the decision to vote by absentee ballot, this decision should give Minnesotans an additional boost of confidence that laws in our state encourage and support fair, accurate and secure elections," Minnesota Secretary of State Steve Simon said in a statement reacting to the ruling. The Minnesota Voters Alliance did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Under dispute in the case are the signatures required on the envelope included with every absentee ballot sent to a voter who requests one. The signature is needed from a voter — or someone designated by the voter if that person is unable to write — to attest that the person is eligible to vote.

In the case, attorneys for the alliance argued election judges — who serve on absentee ballot boards — must rely on all of the information in front of them, including signature comparison, to assure that the voter signed the certification on the envelope.

ADVERTISEMENT

The state argued Minnesota law does not require identical signatures or signature comparison unless the ballot has mismatched identification numbers, a unique identifying code connected to each voter. If the ID number is incorrectly listed, the law allows election judges to then examine signatures as an additional measure to review a ballot.

Appeals court judges agreed with the state, saying the statue requires signature comparison "only when there is an identification-number discrepancy." The judges agreed that rules from the Secretary of State's office giving further guidance to election officials do not conflict with the statute.

"The statute does not require signature comparison when the voter uses a nickname, abbreviation, signature mark, or initials on one of the documents," the judges added.

The case follows another lawsuit from the Minnesota Voters Alliance that argued ballot boards should be staffed almost entirely by election judges from each party. Many Minnesota counties also rely on nonpartisan staff to help handle those ballots. Republican groups are increasing their efforts to recruit conservative election judges.

That case was rejected by the state Supreme Court, which did agree with the alliance that election judges on the boards should handle signature confirmations when those are needed.

©2022 StarTribune. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Related Topics: ELECTION 2022
What to read next
The plane took out much of the second floor of the home at 5154 Arrowhead Road.
The brewers use proceeds of their sales to benefit veterans and first responders.
"The part that is not resolved is not going to be resolved ever," the victim's daughter said after the sentencing. "He's obviously not going to admit to this at all, whatsoever."
Memo says to refer to abortion as a "protected constitutional right in Minnesota."