MEASURE 4
Chelsey Matter, Bismarck, letter: A breath of fresh air in North Dakota
The residents of North Dakota have spoken, and they’ve chosen to clear the air. Measure 4 passed overwhelmingly, making almost all workplaces smoke free and saving countless lives in the process.By Chelsey Matter , November 19, 2012
Perry Ostmo, Sharon, N.D., letter: Measure’s hidden agenda threatens stewardship 
Whenever an initiated measure uses vague or undefined language, there always is a hidden agenda behind it. So, for the writers of Measure 3 — the “Freedom to Farm” measure — what was it?
By Perry Ostmo , November 18, 2012
Gail Halverson, Grand Forks, letter: Yes on 4 means better health for all
There is no risk-free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. Being exposed to secondhand smoke is just bad for you.By Gail Halverson , November 03, 2012
Measure 4 supporters say ban protects public health; opponents say it goes too far 
By Sam Benshoof , November 02, 2012
Bev Benda, Grand Forks, letter: Solid majority backs smoking restrictions
More than 20,000 signatures — many more than were required — were collected to put Measure 4 on the ballot. That is not the government talking; it is North Dakota residents talking.By Bev Benda , November 02, 2012
Dr. Eric Johnson, Grand Forks, letter: Debate is over about secondhand smoke
The fact is that in 2012, the science supports reduction of exposure to secondhand smoke for all North Dakotans.By Dr. Eric Johnson , October 26, 2012
Scott Hennen, Fargo, column: Smoking ban snuffs out personal liberty 
I don’t smoke. So, as far as I’m concerned, we can either ban cigarettes and other tobacco products or not. But this water torture approach to limiting personal choice borders on harassment.
By Scott Hennen , October 26, 2012
Theresa Knox, Grand Forks, letter: ‘Yes’ on 4 to protect all, not just some 
While the language of actual statute is a bit more complicated, the question posed by the measure is simple:
Do all North Dakotans have the right to breathe clean air?
By Theresa Knox , October 21, 2012
Jay Taylor, Durbin, N.D., letter: Secondhand smoke gets scarier with time
No one says people can’t smoke. The measure just regulates smoke away from other people’s noses and lungs.By Jay Taylor , October 19, 2012
Justin Vega, Fargo, column: Anti-smoking measure snuffs out personal freedoms 
Anti-smoking activists clearly have established that equal rights mean nothing to them. Don’t people who smoke have as much of a right to commune in a bar of their choice with other smokers as nonsmokers do with other nonsmokers?
By Justin Vega , October 14, 2012
Karin Roseland, Fargo, letter: ‘Yes’ on 4 may boost women, infants’ health
March of Dimes fully supports this ballot measure that, if passed, will reduce exposure to tobacco smoke by women of childbearing age (especially those who are pregnant).By Karin Roseland , October 10, 2012
After Tuesday’s nickname vote, determination to move foward with campaign to keep name 
By Chuck Haga , June 13, 2012
Residents in Sioux County voted against name 
Residents in the North Dakota county that encompasses most of the Standing Rock Sioux Indian Reservation finally had their say on the University of North Dakota's Fighting Sioux nickname.
By Associated Press , June 13, 2012
ND voters: Retire the Fighting Sioux nickname 
By Chuck Haga , June 13, 2012
Grand Forks reacts to election results 
By Brandi Jewett , June 13, 2012
View your ad here! Cost effective targeted advertising.
Contextual advertising starting as low as $79/month. This includes targeted ad delivery and search results!
Add your business to the Marketplace »
