Calculate cost per use when deciding how to spend
Is a $150 pair of jeans a better deal than a $50 pair? Is a $60-per-month gym membership worth it? Should you spend $20 more for a better coffee maker?By: Gregory Karp, The Morning Call (Allentown, Pa.)
Is a $150 pair of jeans a better deal than a $50 pair? Is a $60-per-month gym membership worth it? Should you spend $20 more for a better coffee maker?
The answer is, of course, that it depends. One way to evaluate a purchase is to estimate its cost per use, rather than focus on the purchase price.
Simply divide the purchase price by the number of times you'll use the item. And be conservative: Academic studies show that consumers, especially if they're excited about a purchase, tend to overestimate use.
Still, it's a great aid in deciding whether to buy an item, comparing possible purchases, evaluating an upgrade in a product or deciding between subscribing or paying as you go.
"Tracking or estimating use is the best first step," said Jim Wang, creator of personal finance site Bargaineering.com. It "puts hard numbers to something that's qualitative in your mind."
Cost per use doesn't work for everything. For example, you use life insurance only once, making its cost incalculable. But here are a few examples of how calculating a cost per use can help.
CLOTHING: Kathryn Finney, author of "How to be a Budget Fashionista" and online at TheBudgetFashionista.com, recommends calculating a cost per wear of a garment before buying it. The more you wear it, the lower the cost.
She gives the example of a $500 winter coat that you wear 100 to 150 times per year over five years. That costs 67 cents to $1 each time you wear it. But if you buy a trendy top for $20 at Old Navy and wear it only three times, it costs you $6.67 per wear. That makes a $20 top six times more expensive than a $500 coat.
Value, not low prices, should be your focus when shopping, she says.
SUBSCRIPTIONS: Consider a DVD movies-by-mail subscription, such as Netflix. Is it the best option, compared with going to the video store, using pay per view from your TV package or paying for a movie channel, such as HBO? Those aren't exactly an apples-to-apples comparison, but cost per use can help you evaluate them.
With Netflix, you pay a flat fee and keep movies as long as you want, but you don't get another DVD until you return one. The faster you watch them and ship them back, the lower your cost per movie.
In the case of Netflix, a handy online tool is available free at FeedFliks.com. It can link with your Netflix account and report on your use, including cost per movie. That makes it easy to compare.
A fitness club membership is another good example. A $60-per-month membership costs $2 per use if you go daily. But it's 30 times more if you go once a month.
DAILY USE ITEMS: Items you use daily do well in a cost-per-use analysis. Mattresses, coffee makers and computer monitors are examples. If you buy a bigger, better computer monitor that costs $100 more and use it daily for four years, your additional cost per day is 7 cents. On the other hand, infrequently used items get expensive. A $1,000 snowblower you use three times a year for 10 years costs about $33 per use.
BIG-TICKET ITEMS: Consider homes. Many four-person families buy a four-bedroom house, using one bedroom as a guest room. Assume a four-bedroom house costs $75,000 more than a comparable three-bedroom house. And assume the guest room is occupied for 20 days a year. If you own the house for a decade, you essentially paid $375 a night for guests to stay with you. You could have put up your guests in a posh hotel for that. That ignores some factors — four-bedroom homes might appreciate more, and maybe the extra bedroom is worth it for non-monetary reasons. But the point is to know the cost.
The same is true for buying a seven-seat SUV when a four-seat sedan will do most of the time.
More from around the web